Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Chris Froome can still cycle uphill at great speed

Not the greatest revelation ever. Up there with ‘oranges are still orange’ and ‘online marketing is a pointless, zero-sum game practised by cold, dead-eyed charlatans who talk the talk to a far greater degree than they walk the walk’.

But if you write a cycling website, you take what you can at this point in the season: Chris Froome can still cycle uphill at a right bloody rate.

A trip up green mountain

Stage five of this year’s Tour of Oman was the important one – a summit finish atop Jebel Al Akhdar, a 5km climb that averages 10%. The rest of the stage wasn’t particularly remarkable, so the whole race basically hinged on who could climb five steep kilometres most quickly. The answer, not entirely surprisingly, was Chris Froome.

Conclusions

A lot of riders will still be improving their physical condition after a winter of relatively light cycling, so you can’t judge too much. But what we can say is that Froome hasn’t grown lazy after winning the Tour de France. He was better than everyone else then and he’s better than everyone else now.

Tejay van Garderen came second, 22 seconds down, and Rigoberto Uran was 11 seconds further back. He was followed by familiar faces such as Joaquim Rodriguez, Robert Gesink and official site hero, Domenico Pozzovivo. Perhaps of more relevance are the riders who performed badly, because they have more work to do in order to be competitive for the bigger races later in the year.

Vincenzo Nibali was 1m45s down, but admits he has been half-arsing it a bit recently with his wife due to give birth any minute. The Schlecks (Frank) were 2m19s down and The Schlecks (Andy) once again opted to finish alongside a massive classics rider. Yesterday it was Tom Boonen. Today it was Fabian Cancellara and they were 2m49s down. I’m giving him until the end of this year’s Tour and if he’s still done nowt, I’ll stop mentioning him on the basis that he isn’t a Grand Tour threat to anyone but himself.

PS

If you’re keen to know at precisely what speed Chris Froome cycles uphill, that does of course depend on the length and gradient of the slope. To give just one example, in last year’s Tour he climbed Mont Ventoux – which is 21.8km at an average gradient of 7.4% – in 59 minutes, which is an average speed of 21.86 km/h or 13.6 mph in old money.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Buy Me A Coffee