Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Has anything happened in the Critérium du Dauphiné yet?

There’s been one stage. Can we draw any conclusions yet?

The Critérium du Dauphiné doesn’t muck about. It kicked off with a short stage which featured a decent whack of climbing. No-one seemed quite sure whether a breakaway would stick, whether it would be a sprint finish or whether the general classification lads would be battling for the win. In the end, everyone was right and wrong – kind of like life.

The winner

Canadian, David “Who?” Veilleux took the win after being the sole survivor of the day’s break. By that, I mean that he was the only one who remained ahead of the peloton until the end. There wasn’t a sniper picking off rouleurs from a mountaintop vantage point. Veilleux pedals forcefully and inefficiently as if trying to dislodge some clingfilm adhered to his barse using saddle friction alone.

After Veilleux, we had two riders who cope with climbs and who can also sprint – Gianni Meersman and Tom-Jelte Slagter – and then we had the GC lads.

The losers

So far, so inconclusive. But let’s have a look at the other end of the race. Did any Tour de France contenders have a bad day?

Andrew Talansky lost eight minutes, but apparently he’s ill so we can’t read too much into this. He’s not a major player either and didn’t make my long list of Tour challengers which I’m yet to publish.

Thomas De Gendt does get a mention in that article, however, and he lost 14 minutes for no clear reason. This doesn’t bode well, but I’m not going to delete what I wrote. That would be like deleting the 30 or 40 seconds of my life I spent crafting the sentence in question and I simply don’t want to do that.

Update: Both Talansky and De Gendt have now dropped out of the race. Still no word on the reasons for De Gendt’s poor performance.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Buy Me A Coffee